Update Samsung A51 Brand New Price Review – Samsung Galaxy A51 review: Wait for the price drop Not a bad phone, just a bad deal. (In the US, by the way.)
Samsung got me. On paper, the company’s Galaxy A51 appears to have everything you’d expect from a $400 smartphone. Big, beautiful screen. Lots of cameras. 4000 mAh battery. Flagship-inspired design and headphone jack. As an avid — some would say crazy — fan of ambitious mid-range smartphones, I was ready for the A51 to take its place alongside other modestly priced flagships like the Pixel 3a XL and the iPhone SE. He never did.
Update Samsung A51 Brand New Price Review
That’s not to say the Galaxy A51 is a bad phone. Samsung has a lot going for it here, and in a week of testing I found it very enjoyable at times. Unfortunately, all the things the company got right couldn’t make up for the rough, inconsistent performance: this is a $400 device that sometimes performs like a $250 one. I don’t think that’s enough to make the A51 a bad smartphone, but it’s a bad deal.
Samsung Galaxy A51 Review: Great Screen And Price, But The Rest Is Just Okay
48 MP f/2.0 wide camera, 12 MP f/2.2 ultra-wide camera (123° field of view), 5 MP f/2.4 macro camera, 5 MP f/2 depth sensor 2.2
The Galaxy A51 I tested is a Verizon Wireless model with 4GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. (Disclaimer: Verizon is its parent company, but it has no influence on what we’re saying.) Both Sprint and AT&T offer this version of the A51, and no matter which carrier you choose, they’ll all sell you the phone right away. 399 dollars. That doesn’t sound too steep, but it’s worth noting that the phone can be cheaper if you buy it unlocked, especially if you live outside the US. If you’re serious about wanting an A51, you’ll need to find a good deal: it’s not worth $400.
If Samsung deserves credit for anything, it’s that the A51 doesn’t look like a $400 phone. With a surprisingly decorated frame; attractive, reflective surface; and with some incredibly small bezels, this mid-range model could easily pass for a phone costing twice as much. As far as I’m concerned, it is
A mid-range smartphone looks the best. Just keep in mind that the A51 might not be a starter for people with smaller hands thanks to its display – it’s slim, but still quite large.
Samsung Galaxy A51 Review: Great Screen, Bad Performance
Of course, with this phone costing a fraction of the price of the flagship, Samsung had to carefully balance style and substance. Consider Samsung’s choice of materials: Wrapping a phone in glass quickly adds to its price, so the company used what it calls “Glasstic” for the A51’s body. As the name suggests, this just means that this phone has a plastic frame that looks like glass if you don’t examine it too closely. The Galaxy A51 also lacks the IP rating for water and dust resistance, which is very common for phones in this price range. (Note: If you Google “A51 waterproof,” Verizon search results may refer to the A51.
The rest of the phone is pretty standard. On the right side of the phone is a USB-C port that supports 15W fast charging and a nanoSIM/microSD card combo tray to expand the standard 128GB storage. If you’re a music fan, you’ll also appreciate Samsung’s proper headphone jack squeezed into the A51, as its single speaker is pretty awful.
What helps the A51’s design stand out is its spacious 6.5-inch Full HD+ Super AMOLED display. It’s one of Samsung’s Infinity-O displays, which, if you’re allergic to BS, means there’s a small hole cut into the panel to accommodate the 32-megapixel front-facing camera. It’s incredibly small and would be easy enough to miss if it weren’t for the shiny metal ring around it – almost like a Samsung
To keep watching. Fortunately, the rest of the screen is typical Samsung: deep blacks, strong colors and great viewing angles for the price. Its maximum brightness seems a little anemic, so outdoor use can be a bit tricky at times, but the screen is great for browsing YouTube videos at home.
Samsung Galaxy A51 Review: A Minor Change To The Mid Range
The screen is very often the most expensive component of a smartphone and I’m glad Samsung chose this display. It’s not just easy on the eyes; it’s a great throwback to devices like the iPhone SE that rely on outdated designs to keep costs down. Visually, the A51 is impressive, but as my parents always said, looks aren’t everything.
The frustration starts here when you unlock your phone. There’s an optical fingerprint sensor under the display, and it’s… not very good. When it works, it usually takes a while to recognize my thumb. However, very often the sensor simply did not work. Normally, you’ll see a little green buzz around your finger indicating that the sensor is analyzing the fingerprint, but this didn’t always appear. Cleaning the screen again didn’t fix the problem, nor did re-registering my fingers. For sanity, simply set an unlock PIN or pattern.
Once inside, a bigger problem soon became apparent – the A51 lags noticeably at times. Switching between apps often felt smooth, as did flipping through app pages and even returning to the home screen itself. You know what you’re doing
To be clear, this doesn’t happen all the time and I didn’t have many complaints when the phone was firing on all cylinders. If you’re the type of person who just wants to watch videos and maybe send a few emails to your family, you might not notice this momentary delay. But if you’re a fan of smooth, consistent performance, brace yourself for some disappointment — stuttering animations and delayed app launches are never too far away, and it gets old pretty quickly.
Samsung Galaxy A51 & A71 Smartphone Review
Exactly why the A51 works this way isn’t entirely clear, but part of the problem likely lies in Samsung’s choice of chipset. Instead of using a Qualcomm Snapdragon like most US Android phones, the company used the in-house Exynos 9611. From what I can tell, there’s not much difference between the piece of silicon and the Exynos 9610 that Samsung launched in late 2018. – Some of the CPU cores are slightly faster and support a wider variety of rear cameras, but that’s about it. It says a lot about its priorities that Samsung is aiming for a great screen and applying a minor update to the chip that was announced just over two years ago.
The funny thing is that this chipset is not any. It sits somewhere between the $250 Moto G Power (with Snapdragon 665 chipset) and the $470 Pixel 3 XL (with Snapdragon 670), which is exactly what you’d expect given how much these phones cost. The A51 also performs pretty well – nowhere near flagship-level, but in line with other US-bound devices we’ve seen in this price range. In this case, it seems more likely that this inconsistent performance is due to a lack of software optimization, which could theoretically be fixed in a future update. (For what it’s worth, Samsung won’t confirm that such updates are coming.)
In fairness to Samsung, people considering a $400 smartphone probably know they can’t expect best-in-class performance. The bigger problem here is that you’re still losing a significant amount of money on a smartphone, and the A51’s performance and price are not up to snuff.
The Moto G Power—a $150 phone with an older chipset—performs a bit more consistently. And the Pixel 3a XL? Forget it. The difference in smoothness and overall quality of experience between these devices is heavily skewed in the Pixel’s favor. It’s also worth noting that all three phones have 4GB of RAM, so it’s not like Motorola or Google have more resources to work with here. And if you’re not married to Android, there’s always the iPhone SE. It’s a $400 arrow aimed at Samsung’s heart, and it performs just as well as Apple’s most expensive smartphones. Whether it’s due to heavy touch software, poor memory management, or something else entirely, this questionable performance makes the A51 heavy for the price.
Samsung Galaxy A53 5g Review: Display, Battery Life, Charging Speed, Speakers
I was hoping that the outstanding battery life would sweeten the deal, but it doesn’t. Despite having a fairly hefty 4,000mAh capacity (along with a mid-range chipset and a 1080p-only display), the Galaxy A51 only lasts about a full day of use. It’s not terrible at all, but when other mid-range phones like the Moto G Power measure battery life in days instead of hours, the A51 can’t help but be a little disappointing.
At this point, the only thing that can redeem the A51 is its truly excellent camera performance. Call
Samsung a51 new price, samsung a51 new update, samsung galaxy a51 latest software update, samsung a51 latest software update download, samsung a51 software update review, brand new samsung a51, samsung galaxy a51 software update, samsung a51 update android 11, samsung a51 software update, samsung a51 brand new price, samsung a51 latest software update, samsung a51 new software update